Sponsor

In the Hajj Zone?






 NO hadeeth of the Prophet (Sal Allaahu Alaiyhi wa Sallam) that says that by the same token. NOR was such an explanation made by the Sahaabah.

 

Then, at that point where on earth did individuals concoct something to that effect?!!

"Hajj Mabrook!" shouted my companion enthusiastically. "Keep on making du'aa for us as you're as yet in the zone!"

 

"Huh? In the zone… ..what 'ZONE' ??" I asked baffled.

 

"You know… ..you have quite recently returned from hajj and Allaah will answer every one of your supplications as long as 40 days after you return from Hajj." she clarified.

 

"Uh… .stand by a second," I said. "Where does it say that.… is it in the Qur'aan or Hadeeth?"

 

"I don't have the foggiest idea" she said shrugging her shoulders. "I've in every case just heard 'individuals' say that."

 

Subhaan Allaah!

 

Saying something about the Deen of Allaah… in light of what 'individuals' are saying?!!

 

You cannot do that!

 

There is NO ayah in the Qur'aan that says anything regarding the du'aa of Haajjees being acknowledged as long as 40 days. Furthermore, there is

Furthermore, it was difficult wasn't only this one sister. A few group said that to me. Indeed, it appears to be that this misguided judgment is very normal among the Muslims.

 

Don't they realize that the Prophet (Sal Allaahu Alaiyhi wa Sallam) said:

 

"Verily, one of the most exceedingly terrible falsehoods is… .to credit to me what I have not said." (Bukhari)

 

Furthermore, he (Sal Allaahu Alaiyhi wa Sallam) said:

 

"Whoever described from me something that I didn't say, let him have his spot in Hellfire." (Saheeh, settled upon).

 

He (Sal Allaahu Alaiyhi wa Sallam) likewise said:

 

"Whoever does any activity that isn't as per this question of our own (for example Islam) will have it dismissed." (Saheeh Muslim)

 

At the point when we say anything regarding the religion, we must be exceptionally cautious and ensure, as well as could be expected, that whatever we are saying is valid and credible. Else, we are being corrupt for misleading others.

 

The Prophet (Sal Allaahu Alaiyhi wa Sallam) said:

 

"Whoever calls individuals to misguidance will have a weight of wrongdoing like that of the individuals who follow him, without it degrading their weight in the smallest." (Muslim)

 

However, more awful than that will be that when we simply make statements about Islaam, without truly affirming the legitimacy of the matter or when we offer our 'thoughts' in a specific matter, or simply rehash what 'individuals' say. We don't understand the humongous duty that accompanies passing on information about Islaam. Nor do we understand the grave sin we are submitting in the event that we say something which isn't right.

 

Discussing Allaah and His religion without information is really LYING against Him, which is a grave, grave sin, A'oodhubillaah.

 

Allaah says:

 

"Who is more noteworthy in evil than he, who, without information, develops a lie about Allah to delude individuals? Allah doesn't direct the scoundrels." (Surah An'aam: 144)

 

Consider everything. What more noteworthy evil could there be?

 

All things considered, isn't it Allah and His religion we are discussing?

 

However we talk about it so nonchalantly without the slightest hesitation, without the slightest hesitation!

 

Without stopping in any event, briefly, we proclaim this to be Haraam and that to be Halaal, this to be right and that to be erroneous. Also, this to be important for Islaam and that to be a hadeeth. In any case, in light of what??

 

In view of 'our' understanding??

 

In any case, who are 'WE' ??

 

Have we moved on from Islaamic Universities? Do we as a whole have degrees in Sharee'ah?

 

Then, at that point how could we say anything dependent on what we 'heard' individuals say or what 'we' thought was the 'right' understanding of a refrain or hadeeth?

 

Who gave us the option to say anything… ..and I mean, anything about Islaam dependent on our restricted, purported 'information'.

 

Allaah cautions us:

 

"What's more, don't say – what your tongues dishonestly depict – 'This is legal, and that is taboo,' to manufacture a lie about Allah. To be sure, the individuals who produce a lie about Allah will never succeed." (Surah an-Nahl: 116)

 

Indeed, Ibn ul Qayyim said that talking regarding Allaah without information is the best sin that you might at any point submit. He put together it with respect to the stanza:

 

"Say: 'My Lord has prohibited every obscene demonstration – regardless of whether evident or masked – and (all) wrongdoing, and out of line mistreatment, and joining accomplices (in love) with Allaah for which He has given no power and making statements about Allaah of which you have no information." [Surah al-'Aaraaf:33]

 

Ibn ul Qayyim clarifies that it is the most exceedingly awful sin in light of the fact that Allaah makes reference to sins in the above stanza arranged by seriousness, beginning from the lesser sin to the more noteworthy. Furthermore, here Allaah specifies discussing Allaah without information in the wake of referencing Shirk.

 

Subhaan Allaah! Simply think… .after Shirk!

 

A'oodhubillaah!

 

'Umar ibn al Khattaab said, "Be careful with utilizing your assessment in strict issue."

 

Furthermore, Ibn 'Abbaas, the one for whom the Prophet (Sal Allaahu Alaiyhi wa Sallam) made du'aa to get the comprehension of the Qur'aan and Deen, said, "All that there is to follow and obey is the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger. Whoever offers any expression after these two as per his assessment, then, at that point I couldn't say whether you'll see it among his great deeds or among his wrongdoings."

 

So be careful! Try not to make statements about Islaam except if you have affirmed information that it is legitimate. Also, recollect, there is nothing of the sort as the du'aas being acknowledged as long as 40 days after Hajj.

 

Truth be told, it's anything but obviously false that has no premise in the Sharee'ah of Islaam.

 

On the off chance that it were valid, ask yourself this… … .what o

Post a Comment

0 Comments